FlashForward
October 29, 2009When I started this blog a few years ago I had absolutely no idea I would spend as much time talking about television as I do now. In fact when Mindi first suggested it I thought it a rather dull topic. Of course back then the only TV shows that got me excited was 24 and…well…Daily Show and Colbert Report I guess. Much has changed since then. Knight Rider came and went, for example.
Now the show currently on the air that I find myself most looking forward to each week is FlashForward; a new offering this season from a slowly recovering ABC. I probably went a decade without watching ABC and without noticing. But last season a mid-season replacement caught my eye in the form of Castle – perfect right out of the gate. And now comes along FlashForward, also perfect from the start.
Back in the day, like in the late 80s for example, a show tended to run for a full season before properly finding its footing. Just look at the extremely uneven first season of The Next Generation for an example – hell they didn’t pull it together to produce consistently quality episodes until the third season. But FlashForward, Castle, 24, Big Bang Theory, and Chuck all seemed to start off nearly perfect in their implementation. The cast, the theme, the conflict, and the very heart of these shows were all polished right away. Had Knight Rider been given a second season I’m sure it would have gotten there but alas that’s a complaint for another day. The point is lately I have been blown over by the amount of quality programming that seems to know what it’s doing right away. I have to admit early in this decade I feared for the future of television – with Family Guy and Firefly cancelled 24 seemed to be our only hope but that concept was so challenging no one tried to duplicate it. I’m glad to say I think we’re living in, for me at least, the second coming of television. I never thought I’d see the day; I was honestly convinced that reality TV would kill us all. To hell with Skynet, we needed to stop Survivor.
So why am I putting FlashForward at the front of the pack? It’s just so gripping. I’m not saying it’s the best thing on television (although it could be) I’m saying it’s the thing you can’t wait to see the next episode of. Big Bang Theory and Castle are great but if you had to skip a week it wouldn’t be the end of the world. But the 24-like serialized nature of FlashForward is like a constant cliffhanger since the first episode – they don’t even have to invent new reasons to keep you watching, the premise is plenty. So in that one respect it has a leg up on 24, of course they’ll need to reinvent conflict for a second season but let’s cross that bridge when we come to it.
Some people have been comparing FlashForward to Lost and I haven’t watched enough Lost to know how valid that is (and I’m not going to) but if Lost had replaced “island” with “time travel” I probably would have given it a chance. That said, don’t try to convince me that if I like FlashForward I should watch Lost – it just ain’t gonna happen. You’re lucky I watched Castaway once. Islands don’t do it for me.
Actually I think FlashForward has a lot in common with 24. For one thing I noticed today on Wikipedia that the episodes are directed in couplets, which is to say one director will direct two episodes back-to-back. That method created great continuity on 24 and seems to be doing well for FlashForward as the directing styles and choices are fresh and engaging but don’t try to reinvent the wheel either. Also whereas 24 had each episode last a real-time hour FlashForward seems to loosely stick to the time frame in which it airs. It’s not perfect for obvious reasons – some episodes taking place back-to-back but airing over a period of 2 weeks and I suspect a Christmas hiatus is in the offing, although I’m less than thrilled at the prospect. I can’t help but notice that April 29th 2010, the day everyone Flash Forwarded to, is a Thursday – FlashForward airs on Thursdays. That’ll be a hell of a day and you can find me planted firmly in front of my TV that night. Unfortunately March 15th 2010 is a Monday but I think it’s more the Ides Of March that they were going for with that specific date. Oh and a cast member from season 4 of 24 fills the role of soothsayer in this particular plotline. And a Shakespeare reference in a show starring the guy from Shakespeare In Love? This show has lots of fun stuff to keep you involved.
Now all that said who will come out on top when 24 and Chuck come back in 2010? Well, that will be a wonderful dilemma, won’t it? For the first time since I discovered it I can picture a world after 24 has left the small screen that doesn’t completely suck.
Halloween Preview
October 28, 2009The TV War
October 27, 2009It’s been brewing for awhile now, don’t pretend you haven’t noticed. You may have even joined a facebook group showing your support for one side or the other but do you truly understand the issues?
There’s a reason I haven’t waded in on this subject yet – I didn’t feel as if I knew enough to choose a side. One side wants local TV to survive and the other claims they’re just trying to create a new tax to buy more foreign content. One side is making tons of money and claiming it’s the other side that’s incompetent and after cash. It’s all very confusing and contradictory. I haven’t done much research but I’ve thought about it a bunch and here’s how I come down on this little dust-up…
My first inclination is to side with local TV – they’re the underdog and haven’t gone as wildly negative as the cable companies have.
This all started because cable companies rebroadcast local channels without paying them for the content. They’re selling something they don’t own, didn’t create, didn’t buy, and never paid a dime for. That doesn’t strike me as the slightest bit fair. And if that wasn’t enough they even use the logos of local networks in their advertising materials. So it seems like cable is in the wrong here based on simple morality.
The situation got worse when advertising money dried up due to the financial crisis – car companies are usually one of the biggest advertisers and they haven’t exactly had money to burn lately. So the cable companies are branding this as local TV being incompetent and needing a bailout. I suppose leaner and meaner organizational structures could help but clearly that’s not enough.
What we have here is a common goods problem. Cable TV takes and gives nothing back from local TV and now local TV is withering from a variety of factors. Cable companies seem to lack the foresight to see that if local TV stations fall, it will hurt cable in the long run. It’s short-term greed over long-term viability. These groups should have a synergistic relationship, not a parasitic one. I pay extra for time shifting so I can watch broadcasts from other parts of Canada, if those local stations go under I won’t need that add-on anymore. And that’s just one example.
I also have to hand it to local TV for pointing out the crazy rate increases cable has pulled over the last few years – well above inflation and cost of living. In fact not too long ago I called to complain about an increase I was only told about a month after it went into effect – in the end they did nothing and blamed the increase on fuel prices. Are they driving the shows to my house in a Hummer or something? Add a fuel surcharge to installation or service calls if that’s the problem – raising everyone’s rates without telling them is a cash grab.
So what’s our way out of this mess?
Should local TV have the right to charge for rebroadcast of its content on cable? Absolutely. Should local TV be able to sue companies that use it’s logos without permission? Certainly. As I understand it neither of these is the case however. So first off these things need to change at whatever level that is required but that alone won’t solve the problem.
The problem is monopolistic tendencies of the cable companies. Ant-trust and anti-collusion laws need to be enforced on cable companies.
In my region we used to have Rogers Cable but then some big corporate deal decided that Rogers would get Central Canada and Shaw would get Western Canada and they would stay off of each other’s turfs to save money. That’s collusion (when two or more companies in the same industry work together when they’re supposed to be competing against each other). 2 large companies with combined near-complete market share agreeing not to compete and carving up the country like colonial Africa or something. At the time I was too young to understand just how wrong it was. And now we’re reaping the crop of these seeds of anti-competitive monopolistic behavior.
But what about Bell and Telus TV and the new Rogers service you ask?
Bell’s prices are pretty decent but for many people a satellite dish is not feasible – if they live in an apartment building or rent their home they may not be allowed by the owner, not have access to where they need to adjust it, not have the necessary line-of-sight…the list goes on. Plus I’m not fond of satellite technology for TV but that could just be my ignorance and inexperience talking.
As for Rogers and Telus, they don’t provide service in my area. And it’s not like I live in the country or anything. I don’t even live in a suburb. I live in a city with over half a million people in it according to the 2006 census and counting the surround metropolitan area that number jumps to over 2 million as of 3 years ago. I live less than 3 miles from the center of the city. I used to have a cell phone with Telus for about a decade and found their service fantastic; I would seriously consider switching if I were able but I am apparently out of both of their service areas. It’s 2009 for God’s sake – when did less than 3 miles become an insurmountable hurdle for technology? I can get wireless internet on a laptop or blackberry but no cable TV alternative?
So unless I try a satellite dish, which I may not even be allowed to do, I have precisely one choice when it comes to TV. This is not how capitalism is supposed to work. And besides, why bother? It seems like these companies have a pretty congenial relationship anyways, how is it likely to be any different even if I could switch?
Oh, and what’s with cable TV including the CBC in it’s hit list in those attack ads? You’re going to war with people you’ve been stealing from, a war likely to be decided by the government, and you decide to attack the national broadcaster supported largely by federal funding? You’re going to call THEM incompetent and greedy? Their president is appointed by the Prime Minister – you’re not exactly helping your case before government here. Heck, forget all that – you’re going to pick a fight with the oldest existing broadcasting service in Canada? The people who bring us hockey? If you think you can win a war for the hearts and minds of Canadians against Don Cherry you’ve clearly gotten too big for your own good.
So here’s my prescription:
Step One: Government has to allow local TV to charge for rebroadcast of their product.
Step Two: Government has to allow local TV to go to go court to protect its brand.
Step Three: Government needs to step in and stop anti-competitive actions by these huge cable companies. They either need to break up these companies into smaller units, hold them legally accountable for collusion, or in areas where competition is not viable fix their rate of price increases to the rate of inflation until such time as competition is present in the market or do some combination or perhaps even all three.
I suppose the only alternative is to cancel your cable altogether and get whatever you need off the internet, legal or otherwise, but even then guess who has a stranglehold on the internet provider market.
When the government, big business, or the market doesn’t provide moral, ethical, and legal alternatives what are we to do? I’m more than willing to pay a fair price for cable TV but the prices aren’t fair and the money isn’t going to the people who create the content. If it’s legal for cable TV to steal its TV shows and make a huge profit off of it how can it be illegal to steal TV shows and not make a profit at all? It seems that pirates now have the moral high ground on the cable companies. How about that?
Review Sandland Tours: A Must Do!
October 23, 2009The bumper boats area is dismally small and the mini golf area looked decent but you need to face facts, this place is all about the sand dunes.
We took that half hour tour and it was worth every penny. It was absolutely amazing, the views, the speed, the angles they take the buggy on will blow your mind. And it’s informative too.
When you buy your ticket(s) make sure to get some advice regarding attire and cameras and then follow that advice to the letter if possible. Every inch of exposed skin will get a slight exfoliation care of the sand and the wind. Cameras should be kept in a zippered pocket and only brought out when stopped and even then you probably don’t want to bring your most expensive piece of equipment.
This is one of those experiences that you actually have to do, it’s difficult to describe and nearly impossible to do it justice with mere words. If you’re in the area do this at least once, you won’t regret it.
Review Wilsonville Inn & Suites: Love The Pool, Can’t Wait To Go Back
October 21, 2009Located just off the I-5 (although not that easy to find) this is a great place to stay on a trip somewhere else but if Portland is your destination it’s not particularly near anything except a Denny’s and a small strip mall. The staff was polite and friendly although when we had some difficulty with our toilet it did take them a while to take care of it.
The best feature by far is the heated indoor pool which is actually open 24 hours for adults along with a hot tub. The pool isn’t very large but the temperature is perfect. Again, this is ideal for people on a long road trip as you may arrive after most hotels close their pools.
The rooms are spacious and fantastic. The room we got had two distinct rooms, a bedroom and a living room with a kitchenette. I was very pleased to discover the fridge in our room and boy did it keep things cold.
There is still a lot of the Phoenix Inn branding about but that doesn’t take away from the experience at all. The bathtub did appear to be recently repaired and had a slight spring to it but otherwise was fine.
Not only is there free WiFi but you have 2 very fast servers to choose from and they had a computer in the lobby you can use as well. This was a lifesaver for me when I needed to do some banking that my PDA just couldn’t handle.
I was so impressed with this property I found myself thinking of excuses to come to Portland again just to enjoy it once more.
Dignity And Privacy
October 20, 2009I don’t want to be old-man-telling-you-to-get-off-his-lawn but I think I need to have a Grandpa Simpson moment here.
I have been somewhat upset with the semi-recent trend devaluing dignity and privacy in popular culture of late.
So we don’t get bogged down in details let’s say since the new millennium began for the purposes of this discussion.
It’s like the only privacy people respect any more is your credit card number, that we all agree should be kept confidential but when it comes to just about anything else it seems the lowest common denominator won the war when we weren’t looking.
Personally I think reality TV shoulders some of the blame here. No one short of The Enquirer has made airing out your dirty laundry in as public a venue as possible as popular as reality TV. I hate reality TV and avoid it every which way I can and I STILL know Vern Troyer is a nasty drunk. I don’t care. That’s none of my business. I would love to forget that little bit of trivia. Reality TV has turned public scandal into an industry. Look at that Balloon Boy or Bubble Boy or whatever they’re calling him – his mom went on Wife Swap and now the family thinks crying and vomiting on national TV will make them rich.
It’s a cancer.
People post on Facebook when they’re horny or tweet about the specific symptoms of their most recent menstrual cycle. Don’t blame the internet, it’s just a medium. If we didn’t have crap like that forced down our throats on reality TV we’d be less inclined to share the most private of personal details online.
When did dignity become so devalued? Take a moment and try to think of people who you think have dignity and class; who you respect on those grounds. Let’s see who I can come up with…
Barack Obama
…man this is hard…
Jon Stewart
Wil Wheaton
Hey, there’s a great example. Wil Wheaton. Mr. Twitter himself. He doesn’t share his private moments at the cost of his dignity. He shares humourous private moments and wry observations but he maintains his dignity even when being self deprecating.
I run this blog and admittedly in the past I may have discussed some things that should have remained private so I’m no angel in this tale but perhaps I’m just one of the many caught up in the currents of popular trends. A falling tide lowers all ships I guess.
Since when did private become synonymous with close-minded, boring, or secretive? Why is privacy something that can’t be respected anymore? Sure we want an open government but how about the privacy of our personal lives? There are some places where accountability and privacy are not mutually exclusive or at war with each other.
I think we all need to stand up and declare: “I have dignity and I have a private life. I have class. There are some things in my life that are for me and my family alone. There are some things that I will not do at the cost of my dignity”.
Go on, say it if it’s true. If it’s not, ask yourself why.
Cineplex Response
October 19, 2009Here’s the reply from Cineplex, see if you can wade through all the crap to get to their response to my actual complaint…
Thank you for contacting Cineplex Entertainment regarding our concession combos. We have recently introduced new combos for a number of our food offerings. These offers are subject to change on an ongoing basis and are continually assessed against a number of factors- including updated menus and feedback from our guests. We strive to convey a balance of value and choice in all such offers. In response to guest feedback, the most recent change expands the number of candy items that can be bundled within a combo. Despite the change to our offering and our menu panels, we have not increased any of our core concession prices to the items included in the bundles. Also, you may see new combos which your theatre may not have offered in the past. The a la carte prices for all of our products are advertised on menu boards as well as the specific savings associated with the purchase of products in the advertised bundles. We greatly appreciate the feedback that you have provided as it is invaluable in our ongoing efforts to deliver compelling menu options for our guests.
Dear Cineplex
October 18, 2009I am extremely dissappointed in your decision to remove the prices for combos from all of your signs. When I asked one of your staff why this was done he said “it’s so you can focus on savings, not what you’re spending”. This is outrageous. How can you possibly offer a product without informing people beforehand of the price? For as long as you continue this practice I plan to eat elsewhere before or after any movie I go to see. This offends me as a consumer and I refuse to purchase anything without knowing the price beforehand - this new practice of yours is completely unacceptable. I await your reply and will be watching for a change in this policy before I open my wallet for food at your establishment again.
Review Della’s Restaurant: Have The Chicken!
October 17, 2009With a sign at the street that simply reads ‘Restaurant’ and a cursive sign on top of the building that reads ‘Della’s’ this location might be easy to miss. On the outside it looks like any family restaurant and inside as well. At the tables they have cute little trivia quizzes to help you pass the time.
The service is decent but they have the disturbing trend of asking you for your drink order before you sit down. How can I order if I’m still standing and haven’t seen a menu? I suppose that’s just prompt service taken a step too far.
The food is good. In fact if you don’t have the teriyaki chicken dinner entrée it is a mistake you’ll regret. This unassuming little family restaurant has some of the best teriyaki chicken I’ve ever had – they put places that specialize in this kind of food to shame. The bread is also fantastic, the salad is decent. Their mashed potatoes have an odd taste to them that makes me suspect they weren’t made from scratch and the gravy they put on it only makes it worse.
The prices are reasonable, two dinner entrees and soft drinks will run you about $32 USD including a decent tip.
Overall the fantastic chicken, atmosphere, and excellent value more than makes up for any shortcomings and provides a nice break from franchise chain restaurants.
Review Grants Pass Travelodge: Great Staff & Location, Some Infrastructure Issues
October 16, 2009This place really does what it says on the tin. The free WiFi was great. The outdoor pool is only dawn till dusk which is understandable.
The shower stall did present a bit of a problem as the shower head is only about 5 feet above the floor so anyone taller than 5 feet has to duck under and limbo or perform some other act of contortionism if they want to wash their hair and the shower stall isn’t that big adding an extra layer of challenge.
The check in and out process was smooth, efficient, and friendly – no faults whatsoever on the staff.
There is an in-room safe and $1.50 will be added to your bill unless you tell them you aren’t going to use it but the good news is they are very upfront about this and only need to be told once.
The air conditioner is a bit of a problem. The controls are older and yet somewhat complicated so check all the dials when you’re adjusting it. Also, and far more importantly, it’s pretty loud so you’ll need earplugs if you plan to leave it on overnight.
The room was neither spacious nor cramped; it was more or less just what you’d need.
It seems that people tend to check in late and leave early at this hotel. When we left for a late dinner there were only 2 cars in the parking lot, when we came back a few hours later it was packed and the next morning it was completely empty.
The area is pretty good, there are quite a few food options within walking distance such as a restaurant, a Carl’s Jr., a DQ, a Mexican place and many more.
So other than a couple infrastructure issues this is a pretty good place to stay.
Review Tommy’s Joynt: Not Worth The Trip
October 15, 2009It’s out of the way, a trick and a half to get to if you don’t know exactly where you’re going, and not near any other attractions. In fact it’s in a strange part of town with retirement homes next to Lamborghini dealerships, an odd mix of new and rather old but not nearly antique or classic.
The setup is a little odd, food is served like a cafeteria but drinks are more like a pub. Their payment options are nonexistent; its cash only so come prepared not to use any plastic. It’s certainly a unique place but not worth any special effort. The meat is good but the bread is subpar. The décor is just a bunch of old pub signs which I imagine must appeal to someone, just not me.
I know this place has been featured on some Food Network programs but unless you’re a gastronome this place doesn’t really offer much.
Not Swine Flu
October 13, 2009You may have noticed a drop off in blog entries of late but that’s largely because I’ve been sick as a dog lately.
Say that these days and the first thought or question in everyone’s head is: Is it Swine Flu?
Well this is what the news has to say about spotting it…
“Doctors say a combination of sore throat, cough, fever, and aches and pains could mean you do have the Swine Flu”
So let’s self-diagnose.
Sore Throat: Nope
Cough: Nope (I may have coughed 2 or 3 times total in the last week)
Fever: Nope (I may have been a little warm but nothing noteworthy)
Aches: Nope
Pains: Nope
Things I am suffering from include: running nose, fatigue, reduced appetite (I’ve actually lost a little weight), dizziness, dry mouth, and weird dreams…and just last night a touch of insomnia.
So for those of you concerned about H-one-to-the-N-one let me put your concerns aside for now. I ain’t well but I ain’t oinking yet.
The Cleveland Show
October 6, 2009The LA Times calls The Cleveland Show a keeper, I respectfully disagree.
Now the LA Times doesn’t go into a lot of detail as to why they think so but from the tone of the overall article its analysis seems to be based on ratings.
Well let me point out a couple things.
First, The Cleveland Show is, diabolically, placed between new episodes of The Simpsons and Family Guy, both of which are producing some quality product right now.
Second, The Cleveland Show airs during an uncontested half hour on Sunday nights. Seriously, there’s nothing else on – God knows I’ve looked. Even if MSNBC was airing a repeat of Meet The Press or Friday night’s episodes of Countdown or Rachel Maddow I’d switch for the half hour.
And the simple fact is half an hour isn’t long enough to do much of anything else. Just get into a video game and then have to stop, wash a sink full of dishes without time to dry them. It’s just far easier to leave the TV on and check your e-mail, tidy up a bit, or heaven forbid actually talk to the people you live with. They could air a news program in that half hour and get similar ratings but those ratings don’t necessarily mean people are paying attention.
Which brings me to my third point, The Cleveland Show sucks. I know only two episodes have aired thus far so Jon would probably point out that I haven’t given it a serious chance but once Cleveland left Spooner Street it averages about 2 mild guffaws per half hour with me. And I’m a guy who loves his comedy. I’ll laugh at a lot. When it comes to comedy I like to think I’m easy to please but The Cleveland Show just doesn’t do it for me. The humour is, at best, dated.
And the most interesting character is also the most ludicrous. I mean, randomly having a bear for a neighbor is exactly the kind of absurd focus-group-driven plot device that Family Guy would mock mercilessly on other shows. It’s like Poochie on The Simpsons and yet he’s thus far the only hope for the show. His accent is hard to place and amusing, he says funny things, and his bear-ness provides a not-entirely-subtle counterfoil to the racial stereotypes that typify the rest of the characters. Oddly enough using the bear as a metaphor for racism is one of the few promising concepts the show has but it only seems to flirt with the idea.
Picking Cleveland for his own show was where everything started to go wrong. He’s a minor character on Family Guy that the writers seem to have run out of things to do with. I understand the practical reason of giving the spinoff to a character that Seth MacFarlane doesn’t do the voice for because the guy would be overworked into an early grave and we would have lost something special as a result but I think perhaps we’re going to his well a little too much now. Thankfully Family Guy hasn’t suffered – which also speaks to Cleveland’s lack of value as a character.
One of the other networks really needs to challenge Fox on Sunday nights, particularly during this half hour or else Fox can just keep churning out this crap and people like the LA Times will continue to think it’s gold just because no one else is stepping up to the microphone. Seriously, The Cleveland Show and American Dad are still around but Knight Rider got cancelled? Where’s the justice in that?
Review Red and White Fleet: Excellent Value, Particularly If Short On Time
October 5, 2009We took the one-hour bay cruise and found it to be pretty fantastic. The price is reasonable and there are frequent sailings. The person you talk to before buying tickets was quite knowledgeable. If you don’t have the time to see everything in depth this is an exciting and informative overview.
The audio guide is at different times hit and miss but it’s generally good to keep it on because you never know when some fascinating or useful piece of information may come along and it’s easy to ignore when that’s not the case. The ship itself is no cruise line but it’s sturdy and ideal for its purpose.
The cruise takes you to the Golden Gate Bridge, even going underneath it and around a pillar and then goes around Alcatraz on the far side before heading back.
Review Hard Rock Café San Francisco: I Miss The Old Location
October 3, 2009I went to the old location of the San Francisco Hard Rock Café in September of 2002, little did I know at the time that several months prior they had decided to change locations and move down to Pier 39. I have to say I prefer the old location. Apparently this new location seats more people but it actually feels quite a bit smaller. It’s less exuberant than your run-of-the-mill Hard Rock Café; in fact I would go so far as to say it was the lowest energy location I’ve visited of the chain.
They did have some nice new HDTVs but not all of them were of the same quality, so depending on what direction you were facing you were either blown away by picture quality of the videos or unimpressed.
The food and drinks however we top-notch as always. That’s one constant a traveler can always depend on – it doesn’t matter if you’re in Las Vegas, Berlin, or San Francisco the food and drinks are consistently fantastic at the Hard Rock Café.
I had planned my visit to coincide with my birthday since the Hard Rock Café in Orlando had done such a fantastic job a couple years prior but once I arrived at this location with its dampened spirit I just didn’t have it in me to mention to anyone.
So overall great food and drinks but don’t expect the usual Hard Rock Café personality or exuberance.
Review Six Flags Discovery Kingdom: Great Fun But Have A Plan
October 2, 2009First, the obvious tips: buy your tickets online and get there right at open. I generally go to amusement parks in September when I can because they’re generally not very busy but this rule only has a limited effect on a Six Flags. It doesn’t matter what time of year it is – it will get busy.
Medusa is still one of the best rollercoasters in the world. You go up two flights of stairs to board this beast and then the first thing it does is take you up…and up…and then up some more. It’s a smooth but incredibly fast ride which is the perfect combination for me.
Kong is the floorless rollercoaster although Medusa doesn’t exactly have your feet firmly planted anywhere either. It’s a little more jarring than Medusa and while not as tall seems to do more to you.
The Boomerang is a unique ride and coming from an amusement park enthusiast that’s saying something. It’s worth doing but seemed to have one of the shortest lines in the park so I would leave this ride to last or second-to-last when the park is busier.
White Water Safari is fantastic, along with Medusa easily one of my favorite rides in the park but watch out because if you’re in the wrong seat you’ll get beyond wet. This is very similar to the Bluto’s Barge ride at Islands Of Adventure in Orlando. This ride also did not have a significant line-up in September.
In 2002 I went to the park with a friend of mine who was in the Navy, he took one look at V2 and decided we weren’t going on it. Well this time I finally I got to it and it’s actually a pretty smooth ride. The fastest ride in the park the most enjoyable part is actually shooting straight along the tunnel. This thing isn’t nearly as scary as it looks but I guess its looks are enough to keep the line-ups down.
Roar is the bumpiest ride in the park. It would be a great ride if only you weren’t constantly being slammed into the interior. I understand the appeal of the wooden rollercoaster and I would definitely recommend you go on this ride but only once lest you end up with a headache and possibly bruises. I prefer rides to thrill me, not hurt me.
Monsoon Falls doesn’t really compare to White Water Safari at all but it’s still fun, don’t forget to stop and watch from the bridge on your way out. Try standing just to the side of where the ride runs – or better yet put your friend there.
So the rides with significant line-ups are Medusa, Kong, Roar, and Monsoon Falls – I recommend you do these first before the line-ups build. The rest you can do at a leisurely pace afterwards without losing hours of your life.
And of course there are the animals, too numerous to mention but I suggest leaving these until after the rides as they tend to have a larger capacity or just have people move through them faster.
As for food I have to strongly recommend against eating at the Johnny Rocket’s. The service is poor (although prompt), the price is astronomical (even for an amusement park), the food is substandard (makes McDonald’s look gourmet), the presentation is awkward and oftentimes you won’t be able to find a napkin, straw, or ketchup packet to save your life. Don’t even think about ordering a milkshake, they serve it in a glass that is far too small and you’ll end up wearing most of it even if it is the only part of the meal that tastes good.
If you have young children it would be cruel and unusual punishment not to take them to Thomas Town, they’ve truly created something special for the younger ones in that corner of the park.
The lockers are $10 a day but with unlimited in-and-out it’s well worth it – although the change is all coin so watch out if you pay with a $20.
Overall, this Six Flags has something for everyone and is not to be missed.
Review Hyatt at Fisherman’s Wharf: Very Fancy, Not The Best Value
October 1, 2009This Hyatt is not well marked so if you don’t look at pictures of the front beforehand you may have some difficulty finding it but once you do you’re in for a treat. The staff is extraordinarily pleasant. We ended up upgrading our room to an Oversize King option so I can’t speak for the regular rooms. The location is fantastic; you’re within easy walking distance to Fisherman’s Wharf if you go down the hill and Ghirardelli Square if you go along the street. There are other sights you could try walking to but I wouldn’t recommend it and the #47 bus goes right by the front and that will take you to most of the more distant places you’d want to check out.
Parking is insanely expensive but San Francisco is a unique case when it comes to parking, you can park for about $32 per day if you’re willing to walk 2 blocks from a nearby parking garage at the Walgreen’s which is actually a significant savings over what the Hyatt wants to charge.
They do love to charge you for everything. Internet either on TV or WiFi (but not both!) is an extra $10 per day. The TV Internet is dodgy, the wireless keyboard needs a perfect line of sight to work and even then you better hunt and peck because anything faster won’t work. Frankly I’d rather have something wired to the desk that works than a fancy wireless keyboard I could try to use in bed that doesn’t. And the controls are far from intuitive, read the menus carefully before proceeding. It’s a little outrageous when you think any Motel 6 charges $3 for WiFi per day and at a Travelodge it’s usually free but with the money you’re paying to stay at a Hyatt it’s more expensive than most other places. I suppose their regular guests can afford it and the business people can write it off anyways. They have the $5 bottles of water but that’s fine with the vending machines and Walgreen’s nearby and pretty standard. They do provide free whitening toothpaste though which I thought was a nice touch, and plenty of towels and pillows all around.
The TV was nice and well placed. The room came with a coffee maker but the coffee it produced wasn’t worth the time, two sips and the rest you want to send down the drain. The desk/TV stand was very handy and had electrical outlets coming out its ears in very convenient locations which we appreciated. The phone by the bed however had so much static on the line it was incredibly hard to hear who you were calling. The décor was fantastic.
The bathroom was very modern and stylish which was nice but the door wasn’t really a door so much as a sliding wood panel as if you were stepping into a closet and it was a heavy wood with no proper handle so you really had to thrown your back into moving that thing and it didn’t have a lock which wasn’t a concern for us but may be for others. The bathroom was large; there was no bath in our room but rather a very modern-looking shower where water essentially cascades out of the ceiling. It sounds great but the pressure isn’t the greatest and since you can’t really adjust the head coverage is splotchy.
Overall we were really impressed however the room did lack one thing – there was actually very little information about the hotel itself. It mentioned some services and numbers you could call which was grand but it didn’t have, for example, the hours of the pool. Nor did it state if local calls were free, which they almost always are but after the price of their internet access I began to wonder. It had a room service menu and some limited information about their restaurant but after 11pm it all pretty much shuts down. What good is room service that stops before midnight? Usually room service is a godsend when you get back late at 3am or something and want a good meal.
On the whole this is an excellent location if you can afford it but don’t expect the greatest value and while they do the grand flourishes and stylistic touches fantastically they seem to sometimes lose sight of the practical.

Posted by cowmanx

