When the primaries began CNN broke down who the candidates were and I used that as a jumped off point for expressing my thoughts. Now in a similarly formatted article they have begun to seriously delve into the potential running mates.
Before jumping in myself I must say I don’t agree with the emphasis being put on “balancing the ticket” and the idea that you automatically win the state your running mate is from. I understand the politics of it but I honestly don’t think Obama, and to a lesser extent McCain, would be primarily strategic in making their selection. There should be only one reason for selecting a running mate which was so eloquently said by the President on The West Wing, “Because I could die”. That said, let’s dive in.
Republicans
Bobby Jindal
Could they try to out-Obama, Obama? They’re talking about this kid much the same way people were talking about Obama before the last DNC convention. That said, no way in hell will McCain pick him because it completely invalidates the experience argument.
Mitt Romney
Much like Hillary on the other side, he went too damned far. There’s simply too much content out there of Romney saying bad things about McCain for there to be unity.
Charlie Crist
51, Bachelor, Governor of Florida with great hair? I think you’ve got a gay. I don’t have anything wrong with that, but the vast majority of your party does. Would be an interesting chain of events if he ran, they won, McCain died, and he took office and then came out of the closet. Bam, first gay president and while he couldn’t serve in the military he’d be the commander in chief.
Mike Huckabee
Done and done. They get along; I don’t see huge gulfs in their values or policies. Huckabee wins where McCain can’t and vice-versa. They both have a sense of humour and I don’t care what CNN says but that’s not a liability. They cite the Obama NRA thing as how it can be a problem but Huckabee is known for having a sense of humour so it was a one-day story. Look at Hillary who has a history of being divisive and not being funny, if she made such a joke it would stick because no one would believe it was a joke since she’s never made one before.
Condoleezza Rice
Yea, defeat the black person and the woman with a black woman! Would the democrats even need to run ads tying McCain to Bush? And how could she campaign when she’ll, God willing, be facing perjury and war crimes charges?
Tim Pawlenty
Who is this guy? His name sounds like a soup.
Joe Lieberman
Joe-mentum? Really? If the conservatives are upset with you now imagine what they’ll do to you if you join up with Loserman. Frankly I’m surprised McCain turns his back on this guy, unless he has a secret cure for knife-in-the-back.
Carly Fiorina
Wow, they found a woman not tied to the Bush administration. The only problem is she’s never held public office – as if such an idea isn’t ludicrous enough but she too would invalidate all experience attacks on Obama. Utter foolishness.
Mark Sanford
Okay, he once brought 2 pigs into the State House in Columbia to protest pork barrel spending so he’s got a sense of humour and lines up with McCain on that issue that few people believe in so he satisfies the “I could die” reasoning nicely. He’s a bit of a pretty boy and from a Carolina so if Edwards changes his mind about running with Obama he could counter that.
Bob Portman
He’s got economic experience which McCain desperately needs but he’s part of the Bush administration. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
Conclusion
Anyone who thinks Condoleezza Rice or Carly Fiorina are serious contenders clearly doesn’t understand the situation. It’s Huckabee with Sanford a close second.
Democrats
Hillary Clinton
When I saw CNN put her name first I was annoyed but then I say what they had to say about her and immediately forgave them: “Clinton is one of the most divisive politicians in America”. As I’ve said numerous times before, she went too damned far. See what I said about Romney above, and then multiply that by ten hundred billion.
Wesley Clark
Please for the love of God seriously consider him, Mr. President. The writers of The West Wing predicted he would be pivotal in getting Clinton supporters to back Obama. I think they’re right but more importantly it counters Obama’s lack of service. I’ve been in favor of Wesley Clark for a long time, he doesn’t speak as passionately or as eloquently as Obama but I firmly think they believe in the same things and want to get there the same way. He definitely, in my opinion, fills the “because I could die” standard. CNN dares to ask “Does anyone remember his leadership in Kosovo?” Yes, I do and I’m Canadian so there’s got to be few Americans out there who also remember. Besides, I think they have a few months to remind everyone.
Sam Nunn
Why go with this guy for foreign policy experience when you can have Richardson? It just doesn’t make sense unless you feel you need an old white guy to reassure people you’re not crazy. He’s been out of politics since 1996 for God’s sake.
Ted Strickland
I see no substantial reason to have him except believing in the myth that he’ll deliver his state of Ohio.
Kathleen Sebelius
Wasn’t she the one who gave the DNC response to the State Of The Union? OMG no, please, for the love of God I’ll take Hillary making my ears bleed over her putting my entire family in a coma.
Jim Webb
Everyone keeps mentioning this guy, but who is he? He’s Ronald Reagan’s Secretary Of The Navy, that’s who. Kicks McCain in the teeth in more than a few areas but he’s been in the Senate for less time than Obama and has a tendency to say crazy things, like he didn’t want the job.
Mike Easley
He’s more of the myth that he’ll deliver his state; why else would anyone even consider someone who once polled to see if his electorate liked King of the Hill?
Chuck Hagel
He represents the end of the Republican Party as we know it, and I feel fine. He’s already giving McCain the beating of his life and for no other reason than he believes in what he’s saying. Oh, and he believes in Obama too. But he’s still a Republican, what if Obama get relieved under the 25th Amendment and this guy goes crazy on conservative issues?
Bill Richardson
There are 2 reasons not to do it and countless reasons to do it. The reasons against are Clinton supports still hating him and thinking he endorsed Obama for the spot and that they could be branded the diversity ticket. Other than those two issues, he’s fantastic. He’s charismatic, intelligent, experienced, and passes the “because I could die” test easily.
Ed Rendell
Yea, sure, you could pick a prominent Clinton supporter to unit the party, only problem is if memory serves he was a bit of a dick while campaigning for Clinton, I just don’t see it happening.
Conclusion
For me it’s a coin toss between Wesley Clark and Richardson. Hagel would be my third choice, Webb my fourth. Only if all those people said no would I then talk to Hillary. And what a dark day that would be.