Overall
Episode 4 was perfect. Gripping doesn’t begin to describe it. As much as I love George Mason and Tony Almeida the crown has to be passed on. Perhaps George and Tony will take heart at what it took to knock them out of the top spot. Not one but two Star Trek actors. Manny Coto. Milo. And of course, the nuke. The first four episodes of Day 6 make season 2 look like a birthday party. Who I wanted to see more of: 4 out of 5. Cheng wouldn’t have been appropriate so score that as 100%. I’ll admit it, I cried when Mason bought the farm, when Jack broke down at the end of season 3, and Jack’s breakdown here.
Best. Season. Ever.
Jack
Jack’s breakdown in season 3 shortly after killing Ryan was powerful and laid track for the end of episode 4. To anyone who thinks this show is action, I choose now to remind you it’s drama. Kiefer’s got range.
Cloe
She put Milo and Morris in their places rather effectively. Regarding her comment about Morris’s character flaw, way to break the fourth wall.
Wayne
It took a little while to get there but there’s a Palmer in the White House willing to give Bauer carte blanche, it’s go time. It seems the curse of any Palmer administration is the detonation of a nuclear device. However Wayne issuing orders within seconds of it happening was great to see. That’s what real leaders do. Much better than, say, reading a book about goats. Much more decisive and productive than real life, how sad is that?
Bill
Bill losing it was distressing to say the least. I think Michelle’s the only other director of CTU to lose it like that and he had less motivation than she did.
Morris
I think it would be awesome if he was totally cool with Milo for the rest of the season.
Milo
Getting better. Getting back to that Milo we all remember.
Curtis
I never thought I would want to punch Curtis but I did and I’ve met the actor. He’s the nicest, kindest, most supportive guy. My best friend was embarrassed publicly and Roger Cross picked him back up, offered some encouragement, and my friend came back to win that level of the competition. Is Curtis alive? Who cares? I don’t mean to sound insensitive but if we have to give up Curtis to have Alexander Siddig be Jack’s new partner that’s a trade I’m willing to make.
Assad
Continuing to kick ass and take names. Please don’t die.
Amar
I was finally able to see him as a dynamic character with some range as an actor, so of course they kill him.
Ray
Much as I enjoyed watching him I feel bad for Raphael Sbarge (Michael Jonas) though. Both his characters are semi-cowards who help the enemy and end up dying in an explosion.
Behind The Scenes
Soon as I noticed episode 4 was written by Robert Cochran, co-creator of the show, I should have known this episode would have been great but even then I don’t think anyone could have predicted it’s full awesomeness, a cornucopia if you will.
The Real World
Within hours of the show’s airing this article was posted on the abcnews website:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=2795969
I have one thing to say to this: Blow Me.
Okay, maybe I should say a bit more as I want to properly rip this article apart. I was going to save this for a separate blog entry but I want to beat Jon Stewart to the punch.
Firstly while it somewhat presents multiple viewpoints, it strikes me as very clearly biased. Perhaps I shouldn’t be surprised given that it’s from a competing network and 24 is just about the most popular show on TV right now. It’s that Machiavellian approach that says putting the enemy down raises your relative position. Of course there’s no such thing as bad publicity in the entertainment world and 24’s been through this before with the Araz family in season 4 only to be vindicated episodes later.
First, the inaccuracies of the article.
“Feeding fears, that’s what ‘24′ is all about”
No, as it so happens it’s all about entertainment.
“A former senior agent on the FBI’s bin Laden squad in New York, said that trainees in former al-Qaeda camps watched movie videos “to get ideas…We saw what Columbine did”
So a guy who thought bin Laden was in New York thinks movies inspire terrorists and that somehow relates to Columbine. Well movies and bowling weren’t outlawed after Columbine so I fail to see his point.
“Fox may think they are doing a public service, but I don’t see any redeeming value at all”
Again, it’s not a PSA, it’s a form of entertainment and oddly enough last time this issue came up the show produced some PSAs to address the issues. I think Mr. bin-Laden-is-in-New-York needs to stop judging TV shows by PSA standards.
“Josh Governale, spokesman for “24,” refused to comment on tonight’s episode”
Well given that this article was up within hours of the east coast airing I would say he either didn’t jump at their beck and call or didn’t want to comment on the show before it aired. Either way they seem to be intentionally cherry-picking their facts and how they’re presented. Which ironically enough is an accusation often leveled at FOX news, even in this very article.
“This television show is very political, and it’s no accident that it’s on Fox, Given their propaganda system, it doesn’t surprise me”
I assume this comes from the just-because-I’m-paranoid-doesn’t-mean-people-aren’t-out-to-get-me school of thought. All evidence I can find points to next to no involvement in the creative process by the network. In fact in several DVD commentaries producers, writers, and actors have gone on at length praising the free hand they’ve been given by the network. Just because something is in some way affiliated with FOX does not mean it’s run by the people at FOX news.
The article goes on to discuss shows and movies from the 80s up to shows currently in first-run that have dealt with nuclear explosions, not even drawing those points back to the point of the article, they seem completely off-topic and completely ignored the nuclear detonation in season 2 and the nuclear plant melt down in season 4. In fact one of the two options of their poll “Has ‘24′ gone too far?” is “Yes. I think the show has run out of conventional ideas, and now it’s going nuclear” it went nuclear in the second season, do a little research Susan James before you present yourself as an expert or even a reporter.
“Television shows like ‘24′ also reinforce stereotypes about Arabs”
This is also not true, the primary plot of the season is about Assad wanting to put an end to terrorism and reach a negotiated peace, I challenge you to point to any other show doing that. It’s not reinforcing stereotypes, it’s constantly shattering them and not just about Arabs. It’s showing you that, yes, some Arabs are terrorists, but some are patriotic Americans like in season 4, many have a conscience as seen in seasons 2, 4, and 6, and that some Arabs are peacemakers. If I may quote my favorite movie once more “Show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms. Then you can stand up and sing about the land of the free.”
“Iran is on the news about nuclear power, and now there is an American TV story on an Arab terrorist using nuclear power”
What they don’t understand is these episodes weren’t made last week. It’s a long process from script to screen, taking months. To effectively reach it’s audience 24 has to be based somewhat firmly in reality. If it happens to discuss current issues or have unexpected predictive powers it should be praised for it’s intelligence. If someone describes reality and you don’t like it, perhaps you should do something about reality rather than pointing a finger at the artist. It’s ironic that someone devaluing fear seems so intent on making us fear a TV show.
“In CTU headquarters — which is information central — they are always watching Fox News”
Again, simply not true. This season, as with season 1 and sporadically in others, the primary news channel seen is the fictional CNB.
Secondly, statements of opinion.
“Some national security experts worry that television fantasy can trigger the imagination of terrorists”
Heaven forbid a work of fiction trigger the imagination. It might inspire a single terrorist so don’t dare let it air and inspire the millions of non-terrorist viewers. What if the character of Assad inspires some terrorists to seek peace? But no, this article is bent on ignoring anything positive and focusing solely on the negative. Now who’s peddling fear, hmmm?
“Fear has been used to paralyze people’s intellects, If they can scare people, almost anything becomes possible. When people are afraid their brains shut off and it makes you confused and want easy solutions”
24 does nothing of the sort. It doesn’t scare anyone and it addresses the issues far more logically that real-life politicians do in their sound bytes. That’s one of the great powers of the show, you can explore a single issue in greater detail because it has to be faced in real time, over the hours of a full day, facing many of the consequences the decision made are heir to.
In conclusion…
I like how civil rights lawyers rush to 24’s defense and these obsessive advocates rush to condemn it. At the time of writing this blog the online poll showed 81% support for the show despite the blatant one-sided hypocrisy of this article. So my comment stands: blow me.