In my opinion the constant news coverage regarding the recent arrests and foiling of a plot to destroy airplanes in the UK keep missing the point.
The point, at least to me, is that the UK kicks domestic terrorist ass like no other. Efforts in the states seem to be self-defeating but the UK are yielding positive preventative results. That’s the story I’d focus on - while Bush SAYS Americans are safer, Scotland Yard is actually making it’s citizens safer and not using fear on it’s own people to manipulate them. Fear being the weapon of choice for terrorists, it’s where the name comes from after all - it’s what they do. The Brits are smart in their efforts to prevent further attacks and should be respected. They’re famous not just for effectiveness but for not needing to become like their enemies in order to overcome them.
Frankly I think the response to the underground bombings was perfect. No fear, no life changing effects, no noticeable drop in travel, and several arrests. Ever since those bombings I’ve wanted to go back to London and ride the tube with my stiff-upper-lip brethren just to give a big ‘F You’ to the terrorists.
But enough about what the story SHOULD be, what about the agenda the mainstream media is setting, namely new travel restrictions. Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that they’re getting the word out but I had to watch SEVERAL news broadcasts just to find out about the arrests. I had to wade through endless discussion of travel restrictions with virtually no information about the incident that caused it.
Can you imagine if on September 12th all they reported on was travel restrictions?
Let’s take a closer look at these restrictions, shall we? For some reason the media, even the usually balanced CBC, keeps looking at these like the ACLU looks at the Patriot Act. Before we get into specifics let’s be clear about one thing: these are restrictions on a private service for which there are alternatives. Air travel and the conditions therein are SERVICES you pay for, NOT RIGHTS.
Let us further refine our discussion by pointing out that these restrictions only apply to carry-on luggage. They’re not saying you can’t take these things with you, you just can’t take them into the passenger compartment.
So the phrase of the week is “liquids and gels“. Let’s take half of that off the table right now: gels. Do you really anticipate having a styling emergency at 30,000 feet? Alright, there are gels other than hair products however these would be to treat medical conditions and prescriptions are exempt from this restriction so long as the name on the container matches your passport. So hopefully we can all agree that gel is a non-starter? I don’t care if you’re on Queer Eye, no hair problem is worth even the slightest risk of depressurizing the cabin.
On to the second half, liquids.
What liquids might you feel the need to have with you during your flight? Again discounting the medical prescriptions all I could think of was beverages. Most flights offer beverages free of charge so I don’t see this need as significant. Heck I would have absolutely zero problem if they didn’t allow beverages BEFORE Sept. 11th AND made you pay for the ones they supplied. Frankly I would’ve expected it. I mean, if you can’t bring a Big Gulp into a movie theatre why is it suddenly an affront to our civil rights not to allow them on planes? Many planes show movies, can’t they be afforded the same right to price gouge a captive audience? It’s private enterprise after all. I’m not saying these business practices are ideal from a customer service standpoint but why have a double standard for air travel versus the fair? At the risk of causing my readership to groan, it doesn’t seem fair.
The CBC website was kind enough to provide me with a list of other liquids (or semi-liquids) that have been recently banned…
Shampoo.
Again, if you desperately need shampoo mid-flight, you really shouldn’t be flying. Or traveling at all I daresay as it’s hard to get a good lather on a bus. In fact, you should probably do everyone a favour and stop breathing all together. That may sound harsh but seriously, if this category covers you, you’re not likely to survive long in this world anyways, why not go out on your own terms and make it less tragic?
Suntan Lotion.
If you have a window seat put the lotion on your arm and maybe the half of your face that might be within range of the window BEFORE checking in. If this solution is too complicated, the window has a shutter. I’m sure the nearest steward, handicapped person, or 7 year old child can illustrate it’s use.
Creams.
Again, if it’s medical it’s allowed, if it’s non-medical and not having it bothers you I suggest you’re too sensitive for the vulgarities of air travel such as pressure changes and in-flight movies.
Toothpaste.
Before going to Europe my mother and brother-in-law cautioned me to wrap my toothpaste in a zip-lock bag as pressure changes can cause them to explode. I thought this silly but didn’t take any chances. Sure enough nothing happened that trip but on my return trip from Edmonton a few months back it happened. Thus, your toothpaste is a danger to both yourself and others. If you’ve got the OCD about brushing after every meal, skip the meal fatty. Or better yet bring an apple, I don’t think they’ve been banned yet unless you’re traveling to California by car.
In conclusion, can we PLEASE stop acting like the sky is falling and big brother is out to steal our children’s right to free speech every time some common sense is applied to air travel security? The fact is with the exception of something to drink you shouldn’t have had these items in your carry-on in the first place. If you don’t need it in flight, don’t put it in your carry-on. If nothing else it’s out of courtesy and respect for other passengers that you’re not hefting something just under the weight limit right about their heads into a tiny compartment that can open during turbulence and taking up space that might be needed for something that’s actually needed.
No, the only part of this story that had me in any way concerned is the occasional mentioning of the possibility of banning all electronic devices. To me this would be getting close to the line, if not crossing it. Taking a 16 hours flight with no PDA, Discman, mp3 player, DVD player, etc? Why, you’d have flights going down over the Atlantic simply as a result of the ensuing cabin fever. But don’t worry, I’m sure Big Electronics won’t let that happen. I mean seriously, if the restriction was put in place would anyone ever buy a portable DVD player ever again?
Which actually brings us to one part of the story I’ve left out, the impact on the duty free shops. Frankly I could care less as I’ve never personally shopped at one of these places but a little ingenuity will fix this one right up. In fact, the solution isn’t even a new idea. I was coming back from the states one day with a friend who wanted to pick up some alcohol at the duty-free store. He stopped just before the border, browsed the store, made his selection, paid for it, and left it behind. When he returned to the car with just a receipt I was confused. Upon crossing the border he picked up his goods at a drive-up window. So, the duty free shops could take down your name, passport number, flight, and final destination and either have it ready at their outlet on the other end or wrap it up and send it to be stored with the other luggage and perhaps you could claim it at customs on the other end. Or move the store to a point before the security checkpoint so you can buy it before checking in and then put it in your stored luggage. These are just a few simple solutions.
I plan on taking a trip in November, partially by plane and this news does not make me think twice, it actually makes me feel safer. Widespread application of common sense often has that effect on me.